This post was copied from another page not unlike this page. I do not know who posted this but the specific case referred to has noted names of the officers of the court. We all are officers of the court.
Diane Milhaskey alj ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT . 10/29/18
Recap events. Respondent pro per asked for one extension , denied,
unheard of a judge not allowing ONE extension but the AAg Elizabeth
Campbell did not agree to it so the alj is siding with the state all the way ,
whatever fits her schedule.
Witness list was not provided by AAG Campbell. FAILED to file witness list.
Campbell brought in AZ GAMING DEPARTMENT employee to represent
the AZ BOARD OF NURSING. ALJ Milhaskey . refused to allow
respondent to ask ‘witness investigator “ to ask her questions concerning
her ‘employment ‘ with the BON. one question AAG did not object just
interrupted, to about “gaming employee “ employment with the BON .The
respondent stated his objection about her being BON employee, and ALJ
reprimanded the respondent for 10 mins . The Milhaskey stated “i don’t
want to reprimand “ with that witness said “you already did “. (is that on
the transcript ? lots of changes after the court hearing. At all times
showing partiality to AAG Campbell. Even the tone of her voice changed
when addressing individuals. From sickening sweet soft tone to louder
harsher “stop your argument “ message tone. (no arguments in this
courtroom just plead beg, and cow down is acceptable.
Again the Bon is using ‘security “ “police officers “ at taxpayers expense to
sit in a trial , for intimidation purposes . There are security (2) at the door
and camera is rolling, but they brought in officers, who sat and texted the
entire time. A common “trick ‘ of this BON. To make respondents look
“dangerous”, with a hidden message to the judge. The “sham court “
started at 903 am the officer did not arrive until 908 am so the participants
felt ‘safe “ in a room at the end of the hall , closed door , with no one else
around , for 5 mins but not the rest of the time. A JOKE !
Although the opinion was already in before the trial started. Milhaskey was
not even a good actress . A long winded speech of rebuttal questions by
Milhaskey stating “a GOOD lawyer , asks maybe one or two questions of
the witness “ What planet is the ALJ from ? subtle little remarks , that
confirmed anyones doubt about this ALJ being a complete idiot and biased.
The state was allowed to bring up everything from abortions to obituaries ,
from 1969 , but the respondent was not allowed to get in one question
about the credibility of this az gaming dept ‘witness” . (what are they hiding
? ) When Gaming Witness took the stand she said “she works for the state
of az and ‘was assigned to this case “ the Judge with that gave her a very
odd look. After lunch when the respondent started to ask questions about
this, he was stopped in his tracks by AAG and ALJ. It appears that the
ALJ asked about this “witness ‘ real story during the lunch break. What was
really going on, although she will deny it.
It also appears that AAG prepped her ‘witness “ who jumped out of the
witness chair , with ‘relief” , when the ALJ got her out of answering any
questions, after appearing very nervous. But answered questions with “to
the best of my recollection “ really who needs a psych eval here? She
cannot remember ? This investigation started in JAN ! not even a year
ago! Then multiple “I BELIEVE SO “ . OF course respondent did not know
to say I need a YES OR NO , can this witness be fraudulently
charged? Of course she swore in respondent, who had to remind the
“experienced “ ALJ she forget to say “in God we trust “ and had to prompt
her. Pretty sad. At one point ALJ said ‘you can complaint to my boss”
really like your boss isn’t part of the problem? (Greg Hanchett) Then
when reprimanding and not show any leeway to non attorney, ALJ made
another inappropriate statement. “I want this case over TODAY.” Really,
putting a time limit on the respondent, after allowing the state all morning ?
Bad actor, how about something like “I’d want due process and justice to
be served, and although we can go as long as it takes I will not allow for
repeating one’s self. “ AAG Campbell mentioned that the Dr who was fired
from WARMC, was black and that was the one in the fictional book written
by Respondent was “negroid” , Campbell mentioned SIX TIMES on the
record, a ‘fictional character was attending Howard University.” Campbell
repeated herself on every count more than once, and a number of times,
exaggerated many times including , intimidation and ‘pattern ‘ of behavior
(over a 52 year period of time , same incident 2-3 times) . While Campbell
and the BON have a steady ‘pattern of corruption behavior” . Linda Monas,
Case defines the incredible bizarre and investigation process of more than 35 yrs old, where there was no complaint. If you upset the Bd they will get you, they don’t need a complaint. The enormity of the paper work generated from cases that go outside the authority of the law. Much Ado at the taxpayers costs when there is NO legal authority to do so in the first place. Welcome to AZBN/Arizona where for every bad government there is a worse, this it.